Feasibility of telemedicine in the management strategy of patients with lymphoma amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: In March 14, 2020, the state of alarm and was declared in Spain due to the spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Beyond this date, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the country changed the practice of oncologic care. OBJECTIVE: Since recurrent hospital visits were potential risk factors for contagion, the aims of this prospective observational study was to analyze the consequences of COVID-19 pandemic in the health care of patients with lymphoma. METHODS: All data were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). Variables such as age, sex, matter of the visit, use of patient's portal, changes in management, impact in clinical trials and suffering from COVID-19 contagion were recorded. RESULTS: 290 patients were attended in the lymphoma clinic accomplishing 437 appointments. The median age was 66 years (range 18-94) and 157 (54.13%) were male. Of them, 214 patients (73.79%) had only 1 visit to the clinic. Only 23 patients (7.93%) didn't have access to patient's portal. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, 78 patients (26.89%) remained in active treatment, 35 patients (12.06%) suffered from delayed in their treatments and 6 patients (2.06%) suffered from treatment discontinuation. During the follow-up, only 8 patients (2.75%) suffered from COVID-19 (7 cases with confirmed PCR test and 1 case with clinical suspicion). Despite the implementation of telemedicine strategies to avoid visit to hospital, 66 patients (22.75%) had in-person visits to the lymphoma clinic. Patients who attended in-person consultation were younger than those who preferred telemedicine consultation (62 vs 66 years) and had less use of patient's portal (7.58% vs 9%), although these differences didn't reach statistical significance. Patients who atttended in-person visits used to have only 1 visit to hospital (43.93% vs 82.58%, P<.0001). Regarding the matter of in-person consultation, more patients were on active treatment in comparison with those using telemedicine resources (56.06% vs 18.30%, P<.0001). Patients with preference for telemedicine strategies had more surveillance visits (65.62% vs 36.36%, P<.0001). With regards of treatment modifications, more treatment delays (12.94% vs 9.09%) and more definite treatment discontinuations (2.67% vs 0%) were seen in patients using telemedicine resources when compared to patients attending in-person visits, although these differences didn't reach statistical significance. Regarding the type of therapy, patients attending in-person visits were more likely to receive an intravenous treatment rather than those on telemedicine (62.16% vs 40.47%, P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine such as patient's portal are feasible strategies in the management of patients with lymphoma during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a reduction of in-person visits to hospital and a very low contagion rate.

A journey through anticoagulant therapies in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus in post-COVID-19 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with thrombosis. Clinical scoring systems and the presence of anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4)/heparin antibodies determine the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old man who was treated with acenocoumarol due to a chronic left ventricular thrombus was admitted to the hospital for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and pulmonary embolism. The patient was started on bemiparin and discharged. Left lower limb acute arterial ischemia and thrombocytopenia were diagnosed 18 days later. Computed tomography angiography revealed a large left ventricular thrombus and multiple arterial thrombi. Left femoral-popliteal thromboembolectomy was performed. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies confirmed an HIT diagnosis. Fondaparinux (7.5 mg/24 h) was initiated, but cardiac surgery was necessary. Bivalirudin was used during surgery, with an initial load (1.25 mg/kg) and maintenance infusion (2.5 mg/kg/h). The cardiac thrombus was extracted, but the patient experienced a postsurgical myocardial infarction. Percutaneous cardiovascular intervention (PCI) required a bivalirudin load (0.75 mg/kg) and maintenance infusion (1.75 mg/kg/h). No coronary lesions were detected, and argatroban was started afterwards (0.5 µg/kg/min). When the platelet count exceeded 100 × 109/L, acenocoumarol was initiated. Thereupon, acetylsalicylic acid (100 mg/24 h) was added. No other complications have been reported to date. CONCLUSION: The clinical presentation of intraventricular and multiple arterial thrombi is remarkable. SARS-CoV-2 infection likely contributed to a hypercoagulable state. The management of patients with HIT undergoing cardiac surgery is challenging. If surgery cannot be delayed, then treatment with bivalirudin is recommended. Additionally, this drug is recommended for PCI. Bivalirudin is safe and well-tolerated in both procedures.

Development and validation of a predictive model of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.

We retrospectively evaluated 2879 hospitalized COVID-19 patients from four hospitals to evaluate the ability of demographic data, medical history, and on-admission laboratory parameters to predict in-hospital mortality. Association of previously published risk factors (age, gender, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking habit, obesity, renal failure, cardiovascular/ pulmonary diseases, serum ferritin, lymphocyte count, APTT, PT, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and platelet count) with death was tested by a multivariate logistic regression, and a predictive model was created, with further validation in an independent sample. A total of 2070 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were finally included in the multivariable analysis. Age 61-70 years (p<0.001; OR: 7.69; 95%CI: 2.93 to 20.14), age 71-80 years (p<0.001; OR: 14.99; 95%CI: 5.88 to 38.22), age >80 years (p<0.001; OR: 36.78; 95%CI: 14.42 to 93.85), male gender (p<0.001; OR: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.31 to 2.58), D-dimer levels >2 ULN (p = 0.003; OR: 1.79; 95%CI: 1.22 to 2.62), and prolonged PT (p<0.001; OR: 2.18; 95%CI: 1.49 to 3.18) were independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality. A predictive model performed with these parameters showed an AUC of 0.81 in the development cohort (n = 1270) [sensitivity of 95.83%, specificity of 41.46%, negative predictive value of 98.01%, and positive predictive value of 24.85%]. These results were then validated in an independent data sample (n = 800). Our predictive model of in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients has been developed, calibrated and validated. The model (MRS-COVID) included age, male gender, and on-admission coagulopathy markers as positively correlated factors with fatal outcome.

Incidence and clinical profile of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients from Madrid region.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 related in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence is high but data reported vary significantly. Some studies show that up to half of the events are diagnosed early after admission. OBJECTIVES: To study symptomatic VTE incidence in acute COVID-19 hospitalized patients and to describe timing of VTE diagnosis. METHODS: Multicenter cohort of 5966 patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19. Multicenter Registry of 844 hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 and associated acute VTE. RESULTS: By the time of cohort data collection, 68 patients (1.14%) were still hospitalized, 19.8% had died, and 5.4% required ICU. During a median follow-up of 6 days (IQR, 4-12), 183 patients (3.07%; 95% CI, 2.64-3.55) presented a symptomatic VTE event. The cumulative incidences of VTE at 7, 14 and 21 days in wards [2.3% (95% CI, 1.9-2.7), 3.6% (95% CI, 3.0-4.3), and 4.3% (95% CI, 3.5-5.1)] were similar to the ones reported in ICU [2.2% (95% CI, 1.0-4.4), 2.9% (95% CI, 1.5-5.3), and 4.1% (95% CI, 2.2-6.8)], but at 30 and 60 days were higher in ICU [6.9% (95% CI, 4.2-10.5), and 12.8% (95% CI, 8.1-18.5)] than in wards. Eighty-eight VTE events (48%) were diagnosed early, within 48 h of admission. VTE was not associated with death (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55-1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of symptomatic VTE in our COVID-19 cohort is consistent with that of other real-life studies recently published. Early VTE events are, along with COVID-19, the reason for admission rather than an in-hospital complication.